A: Yes.
Q: Why?
A: To change the world into the next New World Order. Remember that the world was not the same following the Napoleonic Wars, it was not the same following WW-I and again it was not the same following WW-II. Each war changed the world into the next step towards the new world order of the ages.
Q: Wait a minute, there is more than one World Order?
A: Each change of the world into a new order of things is a different new world order. The ultimate and final result is to be THE New World Order of the Ages.
Q: So war is used to change the world?
A: Yes, war is an agent of change. A nation is never the same it was after a war as it was before a war, and this is particularly true for World Wars, in which case the entire world is never the same again! In fact, you can call war a revolutionary act.
Q: So the purpose of WW-III is to change the world once more?
A: Yes
Q: How?
A: More international, more united, more cooperative, more socialist, more centralized. This has been the result of every world war.
Q: What will the post WW-III look like?
A: Well, it will not be an absolute world government...yet. It will be a multi-region world. Nations will disappear as sovereign entities and will become mere subdivisions of socioeconomic regions, coordinating under a deliberative body similar to the United Nations.
Q: So the result will be a few international regional governments, not one world government?
A: Yes, on the other hand, look at the big change - the end of the sovereign nation state.
Q: In other words, several European Union type governments?
A: Yes
Q: No world government yet?
A: Well, we've always had world government - a secret world government which already controls the world covertly - the great new World Order of the Ages is an open world government in which everyone participates openly and knowingly is a member of a one world government and a one world religion (this will eventually be the case).
Q: So WW-III will be just one more step towards the New World Order of the Ages - in this case, the creation of several regional and international governments?
A: Yes.
Q: Will it happen by accident?
A: Nothing happens by accident. WW-III has been planned for a half century.
Q: You mean WW-III is a set up?
A: It is something that will not only happen, but proceed and conclude in a prescribed and preconceived manner.
Q: So WW-III has already been pre-planned from beginning?
A: Yes, just like WW-I and WW-II have been. Remember WW-I started at the very instant Europe had attained its highest standard of living and the greatest wealth it would ever have, and concluded suddenly though nothing was really settled. And that in WW-II Hitler did not bother having total mobilization until 1943, while carrying out all sorts of invasions and provocations.
Q: So war is artificial and pre-planned.
A: Yes.
Q: You said WW-III has been planned for the last 50 years or so, please expand.
A: Every world war has contributed to the spread of Communism. WW-I established Communism in Russia. WW-II spread Communism to Eastern Europe, China a and North Korea. The Cold War spread Communism to the Third World (Cuba, Nicaragua, Southeast Asia and many African countries).
Q: So every world war has resulted in the advancement of Communism. Is it too far out to speculate that WW-III will result in the final victory of Communism?
A: No, in fact, you are exactly right.
Q; But Communism has collapsed in Russia and China has become capitalist, how could communism come back?
A: Well, that is an illusion which has been revealed by Soviet KGB defector Anatoliy Golitsyn, in which Russia pretends to get rid of Communism while China pretends to become capitalist to lower the West's guard - all while preparing for a final attack against the Western World.
Q: So Russia and China are still Communist powers pretending to be capitalist while preparing all this time to attack the West?
A: Yes, and remember, they have been preparing for 50 years, while the West has been disarming for 50 years.
Q: Will nuclear strikes play any part in WW-III?
A: You touch upon a delicate issue. We WANT to use nuclear weapons for theatrical effect, yet we don't want to destroy the infrastructure we have built to control the world.
Q: You are talking about the Utah Data Center, the NSA building at Ft Meade, Maryland, CIA headquarters at Langley, Virginia, the Google barge, etc.
A: Yes, and much more....
Q: All of which would be the target of a nuclear strike during a nuclear war.
A: Yes.
Q: And the new world order can't tolerate the destruction of targets like these because it will cause you to lose control of the world?
A: Exactly
Q; So, let me guess...these infrastructures of control will not be touched during WW-III?
A: Correct
Q: Ergo no nuclear weapons will be used?
A: Wrong, nuclear weapons will most definitely be used. They are necessary to add a feeling of doom and annihilation, which will facilitate the creation of international governments...and disarmament...all in the cause of human survival, of course.
Q: How are you going to use nuclear weapons without destroying the infrastructure you need to control the world.
A: They will be used in selective ways which will cause destruction, but will not destroy the infrastructure.
Q: So there is a lot of fear there, by that I mean a fear being produced by WW-III upon humanity
A: Exactly! WW-III will also be a psyop operation, in other words, a psychological operation, consisting not only of great destruction or horror, but the fear of annihilation - the end of humanity if you will.
Q: So fear is a major purpose of WW-III, a fear so huge it will cause humanity to...
A: ...relinquish its national sovereignty, rights and borders and accept a New World Order in exchange for peace and security.
Q: Right....but all this fear will be generated by real stuff, right, not just theatrics, I mean people are going to truly die?
A: Of course! What sort of idiotic question is that? The new impetus towards a New World Order will be powered by the ghastly mass killing that will occur in WW-III
Q: But wait a minute, how are you going to run your New World Order if Paris, London, Geneva, Basel, Washington, Wall Street, Denver and the rest of your New World Order power centers are destroyed?
A: Perhaps you missed the first half of our conversation? The power centers of the New World Order will not be destroyed!
Q: Oh, I see. Other parts of the world will be destroyed, quite horribly destroyed, as an example to the world population what continued warfare has in store for the rest of exactly.
A: Exactly.
Q: So, who and what will get destroyed?
A: The future wastelands of the world are already evident for anyone who knows how to read the signs. Unfortunately, some cities and even nations which are with us today will not be there once we enter the New World Order.
Q: Expand on that, please.
A: Anyone with a basic animal instinct will begin to move away from these places, as indeed, many are already doing.
Q: Ok, what places, exactly, are you talking about?
A: Well, these are the places that are going to be destroyed as a grand example to the rest of the world of what will happen to it should they refuse to join the New World Order, a Grand Guignol or theater of the grotesque so to speak. And I am talking about places that have already become hot spots in the world stage.
Q: Let's go over them in detail, please, I think this is important!
A: Alright then we speak now of places like North Korea, South Korea, Taiwan, parts of Japan, parts of China, Iran, Syria, the Gulf States, parts of Iraq, parts of Turkey, parts of Egypt, India, Pakistan and Israel...and the American West Coast. There will actually be giant wastelands as left over as gruesome monuments to this slaughter. Deaths will occur very quickly, much more quickly than they did in WW-II.
Q: So you are saying nuclear weapons WILL be used.
A: Yes, and nukes will become an accepted part of war in general. You already might have heard of them becoming part and parcel of US tactical thinking, in addition to Russian and Chinese thinking, why President Bush already introduced the concept of a nuclear pre-strike upon the enemy.
Q: Can you expand on that...uh...concept?
A: Well, to begin with, naval war will go nuclear: nuclear torpedoes, nuclear anti-ship missiles, nuclear mines, overhead nuclear EMP detonations. But let's not forget the battlefield itself becoming nuclear with nuclear artillery shells, nuclear rockets, nuclear demolition mines and overhead nuclear detonations. just being a soldier will become so catastrophic lethal that people will beg to have robots do all the fighting. This is the truth of why they want to introduce robots to the battlefield! And let's not forget the nuclear demolition of cities. Sound too insane? Didn't the most progressive, advanced and democratic and reasonable nation on Earth, the United States, see it fit to annihilate two cities in order to win WW-II against Japan?
Q: It's just hard to believe that humanity will go so ape-shit about killing each other, especially with nuclear weapons. Do they even have enough nukes?
A: Well, you have to remember many nations already have nukes albeit secretly: South Africa has nukes, Israel has nukes, Saudi Arabia has nukes, North and South Korea have nukes, Iran has nukes, Pakistan has nukes, India has nukes, Taiwan has nukes, Japan has ready-to-assemble nukes, which gives them deniability, France has nukes, England has nukes, Russia, America and China have nukes...and not only do they have them, but they are ready to use them on the tactical battlefield, and there are additional countries who have rogue nuclear weapons leaked out of the collapsing Soviet Union during the end of the Cold War.
Q: Would all the nations of the world be so stupid as to go crazy with nuclear weapons like this?
A: Well, there two factors you have to consider: 1) why use a club if you have a machine gun? and 2) the mutual paranoia and fear that war inspires on both sides, to the point that makes it very tempting to hit with everything available.
Q: What about the 'end of the world,' meaning human extinction and the death of most of the human race.
A: A very tempting proposition, but in saying that you neglect the purpose of war, which is an instrument used to bring about giant change in political,social and economic reality. The world was totally different after the Napoleonic Wars, again changed radically after WW-I and suffered a further great change after WW-II. The Third World War will be no different.
Q: You mean we get to live? No end of humanity?
A: Well, you have to understand, this is trauma-based psychological mind modification we are trying to carry out. Of course many will die, but we are not aiming for the end of the world, we are going to create a psychological change in the human mind that accepts war as foolish and wants peace at all costs even to the point of giving up many things it now takes for granted.
Q: You mean accepting the New World Order.
A: We mean wanting, praying for, celebrating and joyfully welcoming the arrival of a New World Order.
Q: Which .of course, will promise peace, justice, and stability to the entire world?
A: Well, all you have to do is look at the justification for all past dictatorial regimes of the world, and you will see that their justification has always been order, peace and stability. never democracy, rights and well being.
Q: So in WW-III you basically aim to scare the world into shitting their pants in fear of the destruction, so much so, that the world will end up BEGGING for a New World Order?
Q: Are people really that stupid and cowardly?
A: Well you have to imagine your house being assaulted by starving, blood-thirsty hordes of murderous, starving masses. You have to imagine your self sitting in any given city waiting to see whether you are going to get nuked or not as the powers play a game of of tit-for-tat or random dice with nuclear annihilation of cities. You have to imagine bein homeless, on the move and in perpetual fear for your life.
Q: Well, since you put it that way...
A: The truth is anyone will choose a New World Order over continuing to live in perpetual agony.
