9/11: No Planes!

It is getting very uncomfortable to realize just how much we have been lied to.

Reality itself is in question.

The controlled media along with computer generated imaging (CGI) have made it possible to create an artificial reality and make people believe in it.

Recently, the reality of the Sandy Hook massacre and more recently, the reality of the Isla Vista Shootings has been called into question as one actor after another makes appear in tearless pseudo-agony...as children who are supposedly dead reappear later...alive.

Reminds me of the 9/11 terrorists, many of whom later appeared alive and well...and innocent...living in Muslim countries.

Look at the bad acting of ‘Richard Martinez’ (supposedly his real name) as he ‘laments’ the loss of his only child.

GRIEVING ACTOR: ISLA VISTA’S RICHARD MARTINEZ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0KyZyB5VjhE

Or, look at bad (and out of cue) actor Robbie Parker LAUGH his way to a lament before the press over his child ‘lost’ at Sandy Hook.

GRIEVING ACTOR: SANDY HOOK’S ROBBIE PARKER
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oMINqFGNr-w

If you want complete documentaries on all the LIVING supposedly dead Sandy Hook children, just type in ‘sandy hook children still alive’ on Youtube.

Which brings me to the point of the big phony baloney show which started it all: 9/11.

We basically gave up all our freedoms over a planned demolition and a CGI  TV show.

Yes, they actually killed some real people that time (like all those firefighters who were inside the building when they blew it up).

But the rest of 9/11 was as phony as a three dollar bill.

The first thing that struck me was all the dramatic screaming, which seemed like something straight out of a horror movie. People don’t scream like that when something unexpected and shocking happens. They don’t immediately realize what has just happened.

The second thing that struck me was the way the ‘spectators’ sort of presented the event - one moving out of the way in the nick of time so you could see the plane hit the building - others squawking emotionless descriptions of what was happening.

So it came as no surprise that when they said one of the planes (Flight-93) had crashed in Shanksville, Pennsylvania and all they had to show was a small smoking hole in the ground - no corpses, no luggage, no wreckage.

In other words...no plane.

And it came as no surprise that after they announced another plane (Flight-77) had hit the Pentagon, they had nothing to show but small strips of aluminum - amazingly absent again, bodies, luggage, wreckage, and especially the huge titanium engines. Later analysis proved it would have been impossible for a passenger jet to have created such a small, neat hole in the building.

In other words...no plane.

So that left nothing but the two planes that hit the two World Trade Center Towers - everybody SAW that, right?

Well, no.

What everybody SAW was on TV.

I know a lot of people who live in that area, and to all intent and purposes, they say the buildings just ‘blew up’ and caught fire.

But we all SAW IT!

Well...what you saw was a computer-generated imagery show which was displayed on national TV.

Any engineer viewing the footage could have called it out as fake. And many now have.

When they hit, the planes smoothly melt into the building as if they are entering a glass tower and blow up inside.

Hold on a minute.

Those towers were not glass, they were a mesh of steel and concrete decorated with glass.

On the other hand, the planes were mostly aluminum (except for the massive titanium engines).

A more plausible crash wuld have had the two titanium engines embed themselves in the building while the aluminum superstructure splattered itself against the side of the building, raining down flaming debris, bodies, suitcases and wreckage on the streets below.

Of course, none of this happened as the two planes melded fluidly into th e buildings.

Well, the sad truth is...that just like the Pennsylvania ‘crash site’....and just like the Pentagon crash site...the WTC crash sites also lacked the vital aircraft...or titanium engines...or bodies...or luggage...or really any proof whatsoever that any aircraft had crashed there.

A sad shortcoming of most CGI special effects technicians is that they have no training in physics (something any old time special effects artist HAD to have in times past).

Even after the two towers collapsed, the four titanium engines from the two aircraft would have been very much in evidence...none were ever found.

In other words, along with Pennsylvania and the Pentagon, there is also no proof (besides badly constructed computer imagery) that any planes ever hit the World Trade Center.

I know this is uncomfortable.

I feel VERY uncomfortable writing this...not only because I have been fooled (for years)...but because I now feel that what we perceive as reality itself is now in the hands of the puppet masters...

...and the controlled media has matured into an air-tight reality-creating machine.

Want more proof there were no planes during 9/11?

See the footage below:

EXPLOSION WITHOUT PLANE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qJdtuQQ6Ui0

WING DISAPPEARS
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fL_x9NsxJlg

NOSE EXITS OTHER SIDE OF BUILDING
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P5PZxGsYNnY

AIRCRAFT ABSORBED INTO BUILDING
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ETZDA2HmyQ

PLANE MELTS INTO BUILDING
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=60jkQpWj6AY

No Plane Mini-Documentary
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CUoqwUVOxHE

Another Article dealing with overall virtual reality - only for reading (links have been removed by YouTube)
 
http://endofwesternciv.blogspot.com/2013/01/did-911-happen-whats-real-anymore.html

Did 9/11 Happen? What's Real Anymore?

Looking at the Internet lately (including sites that say the Rep. Gabrielle Giffords shooting and the Newtown, Connecticut shootings were staged melodramas) got me thinking.

Since the 1950’s the Illuminati have been putting before our eyes a device appropriately called ‘the boob tube.’

We have been staring into this device (and believing everything it says) for more than half a century.

The ‘boob tube’ has now been expanded into the ‘boob net’ in which even more fantastical images are displayed…in which we are all somehow led to believe are true.

Recently I have seen some staged, fake footage of supposedly remarkable technical achievements (a flying wing device and an hovering air cycle) which both turned out to be false computer-generated nonsense.

The material appeared on many ‘respectable’ websites, including major newspapers before they were found out to be frauds and unceremoniously removed.

Was the orbital jumping astronaut for real?

Maybe…maybe not.

My point is this: 

The fake imagery in the called phony events was very good.

Outstandingly good.

Convincingly good.

The type of ‘good’ that only comes from intelligence agencies.

So my question is: are intel groups now experimenting with expounding a false reality?

How do these supposedly small groups of losers get the training in physics, special effects and CGI to create all these convincingly real ‘feats’ which fool the world?

I smell the effective hand of intelligence psyops.

What got me ultimately angry is that there is now evidence that so many world-changing dramatic events NEVER HAPPENED.

The parking lot video camera footage from the Gabrielle Giffords shooting never surfaced. Now it seems the ‘little girl’ who was 'killed' there - Christina Taylor Green -  is still alive.

The Newtown, Connecticut school shooting has so many fails that you’d think you were watching a cheap TV melodrama – the smiling dad who supposedly lost his daughter; children who supposedly died there but which turn up alive later - in pictures.

See video here: Christina Green Still Alive 

WTF.

See video here: Laughing Newtown Dad 

Are we being taken for a ride or what?

It makes you question just how much of our ‘experienced reality’ ever really happened at all.

You might have already heard the Moon Landings were a fraud.

But we ‘saw’ it on TV, so it must have been real.

You might have heard that Flight-77 did not really crash into the Pentagon.

You might have heard that Flight-93 did not really crash near Shanksville, Pennsylvania.

So if Flight-77 and Flight-93 did not really crash into anything…

…what makes you think Flight-11 and Flight 175 crashed into the World Trade Center?

The physical and visual evidence that the air crashes into the WTC have been manufactured are legion.

The melodramatic and breathless screaming as the planes crash into the building seem phony and played up for the audience.

The way a guy looks up (as the camera pans upward) and then moves to the side as if ‘presenting’ you to the crash of an airliner into the WTC building looks staged.

I know a lot of New Yorkers, and these New Yorkers now a lot more New Yorkers, and not one, NOT ONE saw anything hit those buildings.

To all intents and purposes, those two buildings just suddenly started blowing up and burning, like they do under standard terrorist bombing attacks.

The WTC strikes share along with Shanksville and the Pentagon crashes that NOT ONE SINGLE SHRED OF WRECKAGE (like the jet engines) has ever been found.

Still don't disbelieve?

Look below.

See video here: 9/11 Jet Wing Disappears 

See video here: 9/11 Nose Comes Out Other End 

See video here: 9/11 Plane is Absorbed 

See video here: 9/11 Plane Melts into Building 

I know it hurts to face that fact that you have been taken for a ride.

It hurts to see what gullible idiots we are.

But we are going to have to face the fact that we have entered the era of manufactured reality, where what really happened didn’t and what took place never did…yet still shape our entire lives.

The Moon Landings never happened.

The 9/11 air crashes never happened.

Who knows if the Newtown Shootings really happened.

We have entered an age where fantasy is indistinguishable from fact, and this is very worrisome.

So what’s next, Illumati?

A Mars landing?

An alien invasion?

How about a disastrous plague where we see masses of peoples collapsing in the streets on TV?

Listen.

Experts have even gone far enough to call the Fukushima meltdown a manufactured crisis.

The footage just does not hold up under scrutiny, and the casualty figures (and radiation spread) don’t either.

The spreading radiation is real, but the incident that supposedly unleashed all this radiation seems staged.

So where is all the radiation coming from?

Your guess is as good as mine.

The point is we can no longer trust what we experience through a screen.

Like blind man stumbling through a maze, you have to use all your senses to come up with a view of anything resembling reality.

From now on DOUBT WHAT YOU SEE AND HEAR.

DO NOT BELIEVE ‘FACTS’ ONLY BECAUSE AN APPOINTED SPOKESPERSON TELLS THEM AND SHOWS THEM TO YOU ON TV.

USE COMMON SENSE AND CROSS-REFERENCE THE REALITY THAT IS PRSENTED TO YOU.

The ‘real’ world is about to get a lot more surreal.