Live TV Reporters Readinging Scripts!

One habit I have is pay attention to detail when I watch TV (which isn't often).

I even put the thing on mute during commercials to watch them closely.

While I'm hearing the news (or watcing movies) I even watch the background.

So you can imagine my surprise when my local newscast returned from a commercial and the camera began zooming in slowly past other cameras and equipment on to the desk of the news anchors for them to begin their report (script reading)...

...and I could not help but see quite clearly a teleprompter containing part of  what would be said within the next 60 seconds.

I chuckled to myself as I waited for the anchors to start spouting off the exact same paragraph I had just finished reading.

However, I was disappointed when the anchors did NOT repeat the teleprompter - not at all.

However, soon the newscasters introduced the viewer to 'a reporter on location' and he started to 'report.'

Guess what he said.

THE EXACT SAME WORDS I HAD JUST SEEN ON THE TELEPROMPTER!

At this point I had to take a time out and analyze the details of what had just happened (you know- what people don't do when they are all hopped up on microwaves, coffee, noises and psychotropic drugs).

Scene: The reporter - on location and live - was appearing to 'report' supposedly on what he had just seen and found out...just now!

Supposedly the anchors, the television audience and the entire world were all waiting for the reporter to give us a 'live report from the scene' - real television news in the making.

Yet the reporter's 'live report' was an EXACT word-for-word of what was on the teleprompter I had spotted at as the camera zoomed in on the anchors.


WTF?

Let's see.

The reporter as on the scene live...yet was reading off a script on a teleprompter...

...this means the information he was reporting had already been read, digested and paraphrased as a teleprompter script...before the reporter evern arrived at the scene...

This means the 'news' had already been received at the TV station... at a much earlier time...by someone who read the information, digested it and wrote a teleprompter script on it...

...in order to have it ready when the reporter arrived 'on scene' to do his 'report.'

So what's going on here?

Do you really think an anonymous TV station desk jockey who wrote the prompt is a super-detective, lighting-fast investigative journalist so as to investigate, digest and write a complete article on what had just happened for a reporter to read when he gets to the scene right as he arrives?

I don't think so.

Do you know what happened?

The desk jockey got an official release, report or memorandum from some official agency (probably the police) about what had happened early that the morning...

...and had quickly typed up a script for the reporter to read once he got to the scene.

The 'scene' is just a prop background from where the reporter reads a paraphrased official release.

The reporter gets there, reports (reads the script) 'live,' signs off and leaves.

This is what passes for reporting nowadays!

Pure theater and pretend...which is what I think the news media is more and more about.

I can just imagine the reporter thinking to himself after the shot, 

"What a cheap, phony, coon-ass way to make a living"

Combine this with the phony green-screen effects that super-impose a reporter 'live' anywhere in the world and you've got...complete manufactured reality.

Let's get it straight.

TV has left the realm of reality a long time ago.

One looks into it and sees all the cardboard facades of a cheap reality show.

TV is all about pretend and make believe.

If we believe any of it, we begin to base our existence on fantasy and make believe.

You have been warned.

TV is now the real fantasy make-believe mouthpiece for the New World Order.



 

Did 9/11 Happen? What's Real Anymore?

Looking at the Internet lately (including sites that say the Rep. Gabrielle Giffords shooting and the Newtown, Connecticut shootings were staged melodramas) got me thinking.

Since the 1950’s the Illuminati have been putting before our eyes a device appropriately called ‘the boob tube.’

We have been staring into this device (and believing everything it says) for more than half a century.

The ‘boob tube’ has now been expanded into the ‘boob net’ in which even more fantastical images are displayed…in which we are all somehow led to believe are true.

Recently I have seen some staged, fake footage of supposedly remarkable technical achievements (a flying wing device and an hovering air cycle) which both turned out to be false computer-generated nonsense.

The material appeared on many ‘respectable’ websites, including major newspapers before they were found out to be frauds and unceremoniously removed.

Was the orbital jumping astronaut for real?

Maybe…maybe not.

My point is this: 

The fake imagery in the called phony events was very good.

Outstandingly good.

Convincingly good.

The type of ‘good’ that only comes from intelligence agencies.

So my question is: are intel groups now experimenting with expounding a false reality?

How do these supposedly small groups of losers get the training in physics, special effects and CGI to create all these convincingly real ‘feats’ which fool the world?

I smell the effective hand of intelligence psyops.

What got me ultimately angry is that there is now evidence that so many world-changing dramatic events NEVER HAPPENED.

The parking lot video camera footage from the Gabrielle Giffords shooting never surfaced. Now it seems the ‘little girl’ who was 'killed' there - Christina Taylor Green -  is still alive.

The Newtown, Connecticut school shooting has so many fails that you’d think you were watching a cheap TV melodrama – the smiling dad who supposedly lost his daughter; children who supposedly died there but which turn up alive later - in pictures.

See video here: Christina Green Still Alive 

WTF.

See video here: Laughing Newtown Dad 

Are we being taken for a ride or what?

It makes you question just how much of our ‘experienced reality’ ever really happened at all.

You might have already heard the Moon Landings were a fraud.

But we ‘saw’ it on TV, so it must have been real.

You might have heard that Flight-77 did not really crash into the Pentagon.

You might have heard that Flight-93 did not really crash near Shanksville, Pennsylvania.

So if Flight-77 and Flight-93 did not really crash into anything…

…what makes you think Flight-11 and Flight 175 crashed into the World Trade Center?

The physical and visual evidence that the air crashes into the WTC have been manufactured are legion.

The melodramatic and breathless screaming as the planes crash into the building seem phony and played up for the audience.

The way a guy looks up (as the camera pans upward) and then moves to the side as if ‘presenting’ you to the crash of an airliner into the WTC building looks staged.

I know a lot of New Yorkers, and these New Yorkers now a lot more New Yorkers, and not one, NOT ONE saw anything hit those buildings.

To all intents and purposes, those two buildings just suddenly started blowing up and burning, like they do under standard terrorist bombing attacks.

The WTC strikes share along with Shanksville and the Pentagon crashes that NOT ONE SINGLE SHRED OF WRECKAGE (like the jet engines) has ever been found.

Still don't disbelieve?

Look below.

See video here: 9/11 Jet Wing Disappears 

See video here: 9/11 Nose Comes Out Other End 

See video here: 9/11 Plane is Absorbed 

See video here: 9/11 Plane Melts into Building 

I know it hurts to face that fact that you have been taken for a ride.

It hurts to see what gullible idiots we are.

But we are going to have to face the fact that we have entered the era of manufactured reality, where what really happened didn’t and what took place never did…yet still shape our entire lives.

The Moon Landings never happened.

The 9/11 air crashes never happened.

Who knows if the Newtown Shootings really happened.

We have entered an age where fantasy is indistinguishable from fact, and this is very worrisome.

So what’s next, Illumati?

A Mars landing?

An alien invasion?

How about a disastrous plague where we see masses of peoples collapsing in the streets on TV?

Listen.

Experts have even gone far enough to call the Fukushima meltdown a manufactured crisis.

The footage just does not hold up under scrutiny, and the casualty figures (and radiation spread) don’t either.

The spreading radiation is real, but the incident that supposedly unleashed all this radiation seems staged.

So where is all the radiation coming from?

Your guess is as good as mine.

The point is we can no longer trust what we experience through a screen.

Like blind man stumbling through a maze, you have to use all your senses to come up with a view of anything resembling reality.

From now on DOUBT WHAT YOU SEE AND HEAR.

DO NOT BELIEVE ‘FACTS’ ONLY BECAUSE AN APPOINTED SPOKESPERSON TELLS THEM AND SHOWS THEM TO YOU ON TV.

USE COMMON SENSE AND CROSS-REFERENCE THE REALITY THAT IS PRSENTED TO YOU.

The ‘real’ world is about to get a lot more surreal.