What is the
Illuminati obsession with lesbians?
So far every
single woman they have appointed to a position of power has been a
butch.
Why is it
IMPOSSIBLE to appoint a single straight woman to high office?
Lately the
entire operation is becoming a bit suffocating, with the upper levels
of our society getting stuffed solid with blatant queers masquerading
as solid citizens.
The Supreme
Court lineup of Ruth Ginsburg, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan is an
embarrassing, awkward and ugly excess of lesbians placed at the
pinnacle of power.
Couldn't you
Illuminati freaks place one, just ONE strait woman in the the Supreme
Court?
But it doesn't
stop there.
Everyone is
familiar with Janet Napolitano's sickening butch revel at the
Department of Homeland Security knows what lesbian sadomasochistic
dominance is all about.
In fact, you
could say the lesbian tradition goes back to Clinton's Attorney
General Janet Reno – a total lesbian butch splayed for all the
world to see. Her growling performance following the massacre of the
Branch Davidians was sickening.
And today the
lesbian cornucopia continues with Christine Lagard appointed as head
of the IMF and Kathleen Sebelius placed as head of Health and Human
Service and Debbie Wasserman Shultz appointed Democratic Party Chair
(and an endless list of closet lesbians appointed to high office –
just take a good close look at them).
Meanwhile, the
occult lesbian witch, Hillary Clinton, is being set up as our next
president.
So what is the
Illuminati obsession with lesbians?
Well, for the
record, Illuminati policy is to recruit closet homosexuals and
bisexuals.
This is a
confirmed fact.
And the CLOSET
is a very important part of the Illumianti machinery.
Illuminati's
reject open homosexuals for these have nothing to hide.
Closet
homosexuals, however, can be blackmailed...and contain the
sociopathic psychological traits necessary to carry out the nefarious
actions they must perform on behalf of the Illuminati.
Which brings me
to the subject of lesbians.
A lesbian is
not the psychological, moral or spiritual equivalent of a woman.
A homosexual is
a being with a hopelessly compromised sense of morality,
responsibility, honesty and duty. Psychological studies proving this
have been suppressed.
It used to be
that homosexuals were not allowed in the Armed Forces and
Intelligence, in fact, they were actively hunted down and rooted out?
Why do you
think that was?
The answer is
very simple.
They couldn't
be trusted.
But going back
to morality, responsibility and duty.
Those qualities
aren't just lacking in the typical homosexual or the lesbian, they
are absent to the point of sociopathy.
There is a
reason all those studies which have demonstrated this have been
ruthlessly SUPPRESSED.
There is a
reason why the book Pink Swastika (which detailed the homosexuality
within the Nazi Party) was BANNED.
There's a
reason why so many treacherous spies and double agents like James
Blunt and Harry Dexter White turn out to be raving homosexuals.
And there is a
reason lesbians are preferred over real women when appointing a
female to a high government positions.
You see, the
Illuminati are strong in their insistence on feminism, equality of
the sexes, blah, blah, blah.
This would look
rather stale if only men were appointed to high office - many women
must be appointed as well.
But these woman
can't be real women.
Why?
Because real
women make terrible Illuminati servants – they are worse than men
when it comes to this.
Why?
Because there
is just something intrinsically too constructive, too honest, too
caring and too loyal about women to satisfy the role of Illuminati
con artist.
Women have
developed these traits through thousands of years of evolution in
which they have had to serve as the homemakers, caretakers of
children and comforters of husbands.
A
back-stabbing, jealous and ambitious traitor does not a good
homemaker make...and the genes for this have been extinguished a long
time ago.
So a woman –
a real woman – has solid psychological mothering traits which make
women not only more honest, less brutal and more caring, but also
make them less liable to corruption lying, betrayal, theft, bullying
and murder – all traits very necessary in a good Illuminati slave.
So the
Illuminati do no use real women as their agents because they CAN'T.
A real woman
would rebel and blow the whistle on the Illuminati immediately (see
the case of CFTC chairwoman Brooksley Born).
The Illuminati
do not need real women like Brooksley Born ruining things.
Get it?
Women are
instinctively too good, too honest, too empathic, and too caring to
contract as gofers for the Illuminati.
Real women tend
not to be totally corruptible.
(When was the
last time you heard any women's libber talk about THESE admirable
'feminine' traits?)
So the
Illluminati MUST contract the ersatz woman – the closet lesbians –
to do their bidding.
A lesbian is as
corrupt and as corruptible as any man (and perhaps more so).
They make up
the perfect obedient and ruthless tool that the Illuminati
need...while simultaneously satisfying the Illuminati dogma for
sexual equality.
Is it really
then so surprising that in this day and age, when every nation must
be betrayed to the New World Order, that the betrayers consist of a
bunch of closet homosexuals and lesbians?
I don't think
so.
But at least
now you know the reason behind the all the butch in the New World
Order.
